▶ Prime Minister’s Impeachment Passed with Majority Vote
▶ Ruling Party Boycotts Vote, Challenges Legality
On September 27 (Korean Standard Time), South Korea’s National Assembly passed the impeachment motion against Acting President and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, marking the first time in the nation’s constitutional history that an acting president has been impeached while in office.
The impeachment motion, spearheaded by the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) and other opposition parties, passed with 192 votes in favor out of 192 participating lawmakers in the 300-member assembly. The motion required a simple majority of 151 votes. All opposition lawmakers and one member from the ruling People Power Party (PPP), Cho Kyung-tae, participated in the vote, while the rest of the PPP lawmakers boycotted the proceedings.
Historic Impeachment Decision
National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik clarified that the voting threshold for impeaching the acting president was the same as that for impeaching a prime minister—a simple majority of seated members—rather than the two-thirds majority required for a presidential impeachment. He stated, "The impeachment motion seeks the removal of the acting president, who is exercising presidential authority as prime minister."
Following the vote, Han Duck-soo's duties were suspended at 5:19 PM, and Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance Choi Sang-mok assumed the role of acting president. Han expressed his respect for the Assembly’s decision and stated, "I will await the Constitutional Court's prompt and wise ruling in accordance with the law."
Grounds for Impeachment
The impeachment motion against Han cited five reasons:
Failing to act on the "Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act" and "Chae Hae-byeong Special Prosecutor Act."
Alleged complicity or inaction in relation to martial law plans.
Oversight of a joint governance system involving Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon.
Avoiding the appointment of a special prosecutor for insurrection.
Refusal to appoint Constitutional Court justices as acting president.
The Constitutional Court is required to decide on the validity of the impeachment within 180 days.
Legal and Political Controversy
The ruling PPP has declared the impeachment vote invalid, arguing that the motion required a two-thirds majority. They filed a request with the Constitutional Court for a "judgment of authority dispute" and a suspension of the motion’s effect.
Meanwhile, DPK leaders argue that the interim acting president, Choi Sang-mok, must appoint Constitutional Court justices immediately to address public demands.
Kim Min-seok, a senior official of the DPK, stated, "Choi Sang-mok must act decisively to meet the expectations of the people."
The unprecedented impeachment of an acting president has sparked a legal and political battle, with both sides preparing for a prolonged dispute over its legitimacy.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x총 1건의 의견이 있습니다.
CIA operation...